
Grace and Peace!
Again, my one and only objective for blogging is to embrace a tradition of African griots, in which I am commissioned to tell my story and to chronicle the genuine reactions of a new dawn (the ascendancy of Senator Barack Obama to Presidency) so that my unborn children and future generations can be benefactors of a trustworthy historical account through personal narratives. In this fashion, I am sharing with you my reflections (which are not indicative of any larger group) regarding the discussions that has emerged out of the queer community and the "Black Church" in light of Proposition 8.
As I have surveyed and to my knowledge, the main argument is that as President Elect Barack Hussein Obama won the election--making him the first African American President of the United States of America--70 percent of African Americans (according to a source I have not seen) voted to ban same-sex marriages in California (and at the same time voted against Prop. 102, which banned same-sex marriages in Arizona). This has evoked rage in the queer community and has exposed the overwhelming homophobic tendencies of the 'Black Church'. While the pot may have been brewing in the past, the steam between these two marginalized groups: the queer community and African-Americans, in light of Proposition 8, has blown the lid completely off!
I will share a couple of thoughts. First, and admittedly, I am still assessing this issue and have not derived a 'conclusion' or 'final answer'. Secondly, I admit my defensiveness of the claims directed towards the "black church" in which I belong to and as an African American I myself am a stakeholder of. Thirdly, I admit that I am sensitive to the homophobia in the black church and would like more information (esp. historically) that is perpetuating this ethos. Lastly and perhaps most importantly, I admit my concern for the internal spats between two marginalized groups.
On this issue, I have been an active listener and participant in this discussion between the queer community and persons of the African-American community who are members of a black church. Specifically, I have engaged in intimate discussions with a good friend of mine (who I would like to thank for allowing me to gratuitously borrow her term, "building across bridges"). She has also provided me with some insights that has emerged out of the queer community and I have engaged my own thoughts from my experiences in the black religious community. In essence, I submit this entry as an informed 'work in progress' in which I am still gathering data and processing.
My defensiveness of the claims against the ‘black church’ stems from the monolithic understanding of "the black church." I witnessed a panel discussion recently, moderated by Professor Yolanda Pierce of Princeton Theological Seminary, and she probed the panelist in defining how we exactly understand "the black church." In fact, I wish not to only know how we understand it, but I would be interested to know where is this "black church?" What is its address? How does it look? Is it one of those mega-churches; is it a store-front, a cathedral? Quite frankly, I can’t say that I have ever seen it and perhaps the panelist hadn't either because they struggled to offer any substantial response to the question posed. I agree with Dr. Pierce that the term "black church" does not need to be jettisoned completely, but it certainly needs to be re-defined. I think our ubiquitous understanding of the term, “Black Church”, has led us to make false generalizations about the religious African American community. For this, and for what I think is a good reason, I admit my defensiveness.
I also agree to my sensitivity to this topic, my readiness to forge an alliance with the queer community and my admonishment of the overwhelming homophobia in the black church. However, I cannot subscribe to the scape-goating of the black church because while they may be apart of the problem, they are not ‘thee’ problem. The fact is that while America voted for the first African-American president, America also voted against Affirmative Action in Nebraska. I think it becomes a slippery slope and precarious to prioritize evils. The bottom line is that there remains a codified current of bigotry and hatred that persists these “united” States of America.
Finally, and along the lines of my previous point, I think it is detrimental to pit one marginalized groups against another. I think in our commentaries we should be sensitive of how such internal schisms impact the larger perception of the struggle for justice. I think that although there is unrest amongst the marginalized communities, there is still a larger oppressor. Perhaps I am optimistic, but I believe that African-Americans are not the queer community's enemy and queers are not African Americans enemy, rather the enemy is systemic oppression that infuses our psyches. Malcolm X referred to this as the 'colonization of the mind.' Therefore, I opine, that we need to examine how our internalized fury, futility and frustrations have caused our lashing out towards "our other;" and at the same time, we must be careful that we do not invoke the same vicious cycle towards our partners in the struggle that has been lashed out against us.
In closing, in this new dawn of 'audacious hope,' I am resting on an optimism that future strides will evoke a family discussion (as families disagree but they keep their disagreements in-house and work to solve the problem together and not air their 'dirty laundry'). I am resting on an optimism that we can present a united front—a coalition of the oppressed. I am resting on an optimism that we will not perpetuate a divided front that will have larger ramifications on the grassroots movement for justice. I am resting on an optimism that that we can work together to dialogue our way to a beloved community and build across bridges.
In the Struggle Together,
Nikia Smith Robert
Activist-Preacher-Theologian
November 14, 2008

